Authority catalogue v1.12.27 data current as of

Citation
[2003] UKHL 21; [2003] 2 AC 467; [2003] 2 WLR 1174; [2003] 2 All ER 593; [2003] 1 FLR 1043; [2003] UKHRR 679
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Year
2003
Status
Primary
Certainty
Settled

In brief

The House of Lords held that a post-operative trans woman could not be treated as female for the purposes of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s.11(c), rendering her marriage void. The court declined to use HRA s.3 to reinterpret 'male' and 'female' to include trans persons, holding this would go beyond the interpretive function: the question of recognition criteria was for Parliament. The House instead issued a declaration of incompatibility under HRA s.4, finding s.11(c) incompatible with Articles 8 and 12 ECHR. The decision directly precipitated the Gender Recognition Act 2004. At common law, sex was treated as a biological attribute determined at birth (per Corbett v Corbett [1971]), and it was Parliament — not the courts — that changed this via GRA 2004. Doctrinal significance: Bellinger confirms that absent GRA 2004, biological sex determined at birth governs English law; it anchors the thread confirmed in FWS-UKSC-2025.

Key provisions

When relevant

Cite when: (a) common-law biological-sex principle needs anchoring (pre-GRA 2004 position); (b) HRA s.3 vs s.4 boundary is in issue; (c) any case in the doctrinal chain BELLINGER → GRA 2004 → GOODWIN → FWS → SPA-2026; (d) the GRA's legislative history is being explained; (e) trans-recognition law generally — Bellinger is the foundational HL authority on which Parliament's GRA 2004 response built.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 .