Christine Goodwin v The United Kingdom (Application No. 28957/95)
The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber ruled that the United Kingdom's failure to alter the birth certificates of transsexual people and to…
Authority catalogue v1.12.69data current as of
Read the source at hudoc.echr.coe.int ↗
- Citation
- Application No. 28957/95
- Jurisdiction
- ECHR
- Year
- 2002
- Status
- Primary
- Certainty
- Settled
In brief
The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber ruled that the United Kingdom's failure to alter the birth certificates of transsexual people and to allow them to marry in their acquired gender violated Article 8 (right to respect for private life) and Article 12 (right to marry) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This landmark judgment directly led to the UK Parliament enacting the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
Key provisions
- Article 8 ECHR — right to legal recognition of acquired gender: The European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's failure to provide legal recognition of acquired gender violated Article 8 ECHR (right to private life).
- Article 12 ECHR — right to marry in acquired gender: The UK's failure to allow a trans person to marry in their acquired gender violated Article 12 ECHR (right to marry).
- holding-1 — State's positive obligation to recognise gender identity: The European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's failure to provide legal recognition of acquired gender violated Article 8 ECHR (right to private life).
- holding-2 — Departure from Rees v UK and Cossey v UK precedents: The UK's failure to allow a trans person to marry in their acquired gender violated Article 12 ECHR (right to marry).
When relevant
Understanding the human rights foundation of gender recognition in the UK. The case that triggered the GRA 2004. Relevant when considering the Convention rights dimension of trans inclusion policies.
Take this further
Assess your organisation
See how your policies and practice measure up against this authority — and the other 124 in the catalogue — with the toolkit's free diagnostic.
Related reading
Related authorities
- AP, Garçon and Nicot v France (Application Nos. 79885/12, 52471/13, 52596/13)
- B v France (Application No. 13343/87)
- Hämäläinen v Finland (Application No. 37359/09)
- I v The United Kingdom (Application No. 25680/94)
- Identoba and Others v Georgia (Application No. 73235/12)
- L v Lithuania (Application No. 27527/03)
Browse the full authority catalogue or the toolkit's resources hub for more context.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.