The claimant, a trans woman who had lived and worked as female since 1991, was refused a state retirement pension at the age of 60 (the then-female retirement age) because the UK had not legally recognised her acquired sex. The ECJ held that Directive 79/7 (social security) precluded legislation that denied a trans person a state pension at the age applicable to their acquired sex where the member state had not provided a means for legal recognition. The refusal constituted unequal treatment on grounds of sex.
Key provisions
paras-29-38 — Sex discrimination in state pension age based on absence of legal recognition: A state pension rule that denies a trans person retirement at the age applicable to their acquired sex is sex discrimination under Directive 79/7, where the Member State has not provided a means for legal recognition.
When relevant
State-benefit cases involving trans persons, Arguments about the scope of sex discrimination protection, Historical context for GRA 2004
Take this further
Assess your organisation
See how your policies and practice measure up against this authority — and the other 121 in the catalogue — with the toolkit's free diagnostic.
We use analytics cookies to understand how visitors use this site so we can improve it. We
only set them if you accept. See our privacy policy for details.