Authority catalogue v1.12.27 data current as of

Citation
County Court Case No K03CL077
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Year
2025
Status
Persuasive
Certainty
Settled

In brief

A barrister (Allison Bailey) was de-registered by her veterinary practice because of her gender-critical beliefs expressed on social media. The County Court found this constituted direct discrimination in the provision of services under s.29 EA2010. The practice's internal culture around trans rights, and the selective application of its zero-tolerance policy (applied to gender-critical views but not to opposing views), were evidence of discriminatory motive. This extends the Forstater line of authority from employment into services.

Key provisions

When relevant

Service providers, membership organisations, and any organisation that provides goods or services to people who may hold gender-critical beliefs. Relevant to the toolkit's competing rights framework — organisations must balance protection for trans people AND people with gender-critical beliefs, not just in employment but in service delivery. Affects L2-F2 (Boundary Testing) and the Roast's analysis of belief-accommodation in service contexts.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 .